avoid the conclusion that much of the delay difficult night has been prevented if Mr Fisher was to blame.
A more accurate view is that his duties as Executive Engineer were what succeeded in maintaining better relations with the Architects.
3189/13) asked for intercession with the Architects on the subject and has been told to put his statements in writing. This long letter is his defence. I wish to see the original file of papers in SP's office.His case is very irregular, and I do not see that it really helps his case for I find the documents therein almost impossible to understand or illuminate.
I am wrong; had the whole of this letter been before me, an important part of the case would have been clear. It is clear that his failure to maintain good relations with the Architects seems to be a recurring theme. It is, however, apparently not unique that other persons in Govt service had found these particular architects difficult to deal with, but Mr Fisher seems to have started with a bias against the firm which does not tend to harmonious cooperation. The real point against him, however, is the way in which he took advantage of his position as Executive Engineer in charge of the work. The Committee reported (3189/13) that the delay in the work was due to
| Cause | Description |
|---|---|
| (1) | Retention by the PW for 2 months of draft plans which were finally rejected |
| (2) | Differences of opinion between Mr Fisher and the Architects as to what drawings were required to obtain constructional requirements |
| (3) | The strained relations between Mr Fisher and the Architects for most of the time. |
Tending to the cause, Mr Fisher complained of the defective plans, and he had no real...
"avoid the conclusion that much of the delay diffiably night has been nevented if My Fisher was Fallen
a more accurate new
"This duties as Excenters Engmar, what succeeded in maintaining better relations 'with the Architects".
7. Zöher (que senci - official come attacked
to
3189/13) asked for
گان آنها
intercers with the
it on the subject has been told to put his statements in writing. This long witter is his defence. Mithe count
wish to see the Ab
I do not undesired how of fishes her hun enabled in
carry off from it kong what affec
to be the onginal file a papers
SP's's office.
His
very
in the
megular, ef
do not see that it really and his case for I find the doucemen to therein almost miporsille to undrestand
minnate.
Le
: you may
I am wrand had the whole of this litter beno
ant one
important part of the cenome
by his failure to maintain good relations
with
92
with the Torchitects: it seems
A
receriig
to elaborate the point. It is, however, apparently
time that other pers
- persons in Gort service had found these partialar architects difficult to deal with, hat My Fisher seems to hard started with a bis aganist the form which does not tend & hormonions cooperation. The real point against him, however, in the new which he took of his position Execution Engineer in change the work. The Committe reported (mel in 3-89) that the delay
in the work was due to
(1) Retention by the PW. for 2 gem of mof plans which was finally rejecte
A
wee
(2) Defferences Lopinion behin 17 Zisher
to what drawings the architects required nguements
to cutain constructional
(3) Ihre strained ulations those of Zv
the are
architects
for
most of the time.
tending to the Ctus py fisher complained of
the defective plans roaid he had no real,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.